Vendors › Data Loss Prevention › Code42 Incydr
Code42 Incydr
Code42 (Mimecast)
Combined score
▪ Editorial verdict
Code42 Incydr approaches DLP from a genuinely different angle, tracking file movement and exfiltration behaviour directly rather than scanning content against classification rules, meaning detection does not depend on completing extensive data classification work first. This behavioural approach has made Incydr particularly strong for departing employee investigation, where security and legal teams need detailed forensic timelines of exactly what data a leaving employee accessed or transferred before exit.
The honest scope limitation is that channel coverage concentrates on endpoint, cloud, and email rather than the widest content-based data protection surface, and compliance framework mapping trails Forcepoint or Symantec.
The verdict: right for organisations whose primary DLP driver is insider risk and departing employee investigation. Organisations needing the broadest compliance mapping should evaluate Forcepoint or Microsoft Purview DLP instead.
Last reviewed: September 2026
G2
Gartner
PeerSpot
Data Loss Prevention assessment
Strongest: Incident forensics
Watch out for: Compliance alignment
Strengths & limitations
Strengths
Watch out for
Best for
Organisations whose primary DLP driver is insider risk and departing employee data theft investigation.
Not suitable for: Organisations needing the broadest possible channel coverage and content-based compliance mapping.
Compliance coverage
Switching intelligence
Switching from
Common migration paths based on review data
- Content-inspection DLP without insider risk focus
- Manual offboarding review