Comparisec
← Data Loss PreventionCyberhaven
StrongStrongStrongAdequate
4.6

Vendors › Data Loss Prevention › Cyberhaven

Cyberhaven logo

Cyberhaven

Cyberhaven

Founded 2019·US·VC-backed
4.6

Combined score

G2
4.761
Gartner
4.644

▪ Editorial verdict

Cyberhaven has built a genuinely different detection architecture, tracking data lineage from origin through every subsequent transformation rather than relying on content classification at a single point in time. This approach has proven particularly valuable for monitoring exposure to generative AI applications, an increasingly common and often overlooked exfiltration vector where employees paste sensitive information into tools like ChatGPT.

The honest limitation is the same one most newer, architecturally differentiated entrants carry: compliance documentation trails the decades of regulatory mapping Forcepoint or Symantec have built.

The verdict: right for organisations wanting modern data lineage-based DLP including generative AI exposure monitoring. Large enterprises needing the most comprehensive compliance documentation should evaluate Forcepoint or Microsoft Purview DLP instead.

Last reviewed: September 2026

G2

4.761 reviews

Gartner

4.644 reviews

PeerSpot

8.430 reviews
Gartner MQ: Not in MQ

Data Loss Prevention assessment

PROTECTIONStrong
Channel coverage
4 / 5
Content inspection
5 / 5
OPERATIONSStrong
Policy management
4 / 5
Deployment ease
4 / 5
ANALYTICSStrong
Incident forensics
4 / 5
TRUST & ECOSYSTEMAdequate
Compliance alignment
3 / 5

Strongest: Content inspection

Watch out for: Compliance alignment

Strengths & limitations

Strengths

●Genuine data lineage tracking that follows data from origin through every transformation, catching exfiltration that evades point-in-time classifiers
●Strong coverage extending to generative AI applications, tracking whether sensitive data has been pasted into tools like ChatGPT
●Faster deployment than classification-heavy traditional DLP, requiring meaningfully less upfront taxonomy work

Watch out for

●Compliance framework mapping is less comprehensive than legacy enterprise DLP vendors
●Shorter track record than established DLP vendors, with correspondingly less enterprise-scale deployment history
●No Gartner Magic Quadrant presence

Best for

Organisations wanting modern data lineage-based DLP that tracks data through its full lifecycle including generative AI exposure.

Not suitable for: Large enterprises needing the most comprehensive regulatory compliance documentation.

Compliance coverage

●SOC 2
●GDPR
○Essential Eight
○AU Privacy Act
○HIPAA
○NIST CSF
○PCI-DSS
○CMMC
○NIS2
○DORA
○ISO 27001
○CIS Benchmarks

Switching intelligence

Switching from

Common migration paths based on review data

Also considering

Vendors typically shortlisted alongside

← Back to Data Loss PreventionCompare with other Data Loss Prevention vendors ➲

Quick facts

Pricing modelPer user, annual
Pricing rangeQuote-based, mid-market to enterprise
Free trialNo
Min seatsNo minimum
Deployment time1-2 weeks
Complexity2 / 5
Pricing transparency2 / 5
AU presenceNo
IRAP assessedNo
Open sourceProprietary

Deployment

ModelsSaaS
OS supportWindows, macOS
CloudAWS, Azure, GCP
SupportEmail, Dedicated CSM
Data residencyUS

Company

Cyberhaven

Founded 2019 · 50-200 employees · VC-backed

HQ: US

Not publicly disclosed

Certifications

SOC 2 Type II

Integrations

Microsoft 365Google WorkspaceSlackOpenAIOkta