Comparisec
← MDR / Managed SOCDeepwatch MDR
StrongStrongStrongAdequate
4.3

Vendors › MDR / Managed SOC › Deepwatch MDR

Deepwatch MDR logo

Deepwatch MDR

Deepwatch

Founded 2018·US·VC-backed
4.3

Combined score

G2
4.534
Gartner
4.328

▪ Editorial verdict

Deepwatch has built its MDR service around dedicated named security team continuity, a model conceptually similar to Arctic Wolf's Concierge approach, and reviewers consistently praise the account team responsiveness and relationship consistency that comes with it. The vendor-agnostic architecture means organisations can keep their existing SIEM and EDR investments rather than standardising on a new platform, which matters for organisations that have already made significant tooling commitments.

The honest limitation is track record. Deepwatch is newer than eSentire, Red Canary, or Arctic Wolf, with a smaller independent review base and no Gartner Magic Quadrant presence to validate it against the established players.

The verdict: Deepwatch is right for mid-market organisations wanting a dedicated named security team with vendor-agnostic integration into their existing SIEM or EDR investment. Organisations prioritising the longest track record and largest independent validation base should evaluate Arctic Wolf or eSentire instead.

Last reviewed: September 2026

G2

4.534 reviews

Gartner

4.328 reviews

PeerSpot

8.020 reviews
Gartner MQ: Not in MQ

MDR / Managed SOC assessment

PROTECTIONStrong
Detection fidelity
4 / 5
Response capability
4 / 5
OPERATIONSStrong
Tool integration
4 / 5
Service transparency
4 / 5
ANALYTICSStrong
Threat visibility
4 / 5
TRUST & ECOSYSTEMAdequate
Analyst recognition
3 / 5

Strongest: Detection fidelity

Watch out for: Analyst recognition

Strengths & limitations

Strengths

●Named Squad model provides dedicated, consistent security team continuity similar to Arctic Wolf's Concierge approach
●Vendor-agnostic architecture works with a customer's existing SIEM, EDR, and cloud security investments without requiring replacement
●Growing reviewer satisfaction with particular praise for account team responsiveness and relationship continuity

Watch out for

●Shorter public track record than eSentire, Red Canary, or Arctic Wolf, with less independent validation and case study depth available
●Not positioned in any Gartner Magic Quadrant, limiting formal analyst validation for procurement processes
●Smaller reviewer volume than the established category leaders makes independent assessment somewhat harder to verify at scale

Best for

Mid-market organisations wanting a dedicated named security team with vendor-agnostic tool integration, particularly those already invested in a specific SIEM or EDR platform.

Not suitable for: Organisations requiring the longest possible track record and largest independent review volume for procurement risk assessment.

Compliance coverage

●SOC 2
●HIPAA
●NIST CSF
●PCI-DSS
○Essential Eight
○AU Privacy Act
○CMMC
○GDPR
○NIS2
○DORA
○ISO 27001
○CIS Benchmarks

Switching intelligence

Switching from

Common migration paths based on review data

  • Internal SOC
  • Legacy MSSP

Also considering

Vendors typically shortlisted alongside

← Back to MDR / Managed SOCCompare with other MDR / Managed SOC vendors ➲

Quick facts

Pricing modelPer asset, annual, quote-based
Pricing rangeQuote-based, enterprise
Free trialNo
Min seats100
Deployment time2-4 weeks
Complexity3 / 5
Pricing transparency2 / 5
AU presenceNo
IRAP assessedNo
Open sourceProprietary

Deployment

ModelsSaaS
OS supportWindows, macOS, Linux
CloudAWS, Azure, GCP
Support24/7 SOC, Email, Dedicated CSM
Data residencyUS

Company

Deepwatch

Founded 2018 · 200-500 employees · VC-backed

HQ: US

Not publicly disclosed

Certifications

SOC 2

Integrations

SplunkMicrosoft SentinelCrowdStrikeSentinelOne