Comparisec
← WAF / Web Application FirewallAWS WAF
StrongStrongStrongStrong
4.4

Vendors › WAF / Web Application Firewall › AWS WAF

AWS WAF logo

AWS WAF

Amazon Web Services

Founded 2006·US·Public
4.4

Combined score

G2
4.3120
Gartner
4.5200

▪ Editorial verdict

AWS WAF delivers the same operational efficiency proposition for web application security that the rest of AWS delivers for infrastructure: zero deployment, pay-as-you-go pricing, and native integration with the services that AWS-hosted applications already use. The 97.526% true positive rate in independent testing confirms that the detection quality is competitive with dedicated WAF vendors. For organisations running applications on AWS that need a starting WAF without procurement complexity or upfront commitment, AWS WAF is the natural first step.

The scope is AWS-hosted resources only. Applications running on Azure, GCP, on-premises, or multi-cloud environments are not protected, and advanced bot management sophistication is less than Cloudflare or Imperva.

The verdict: AWS WAF is right for AWS-native organisations wanting built-in WAF with no deployment overhead and transparent pay-as-you-go pricing. Multi-cloud and on-premises environments should evaluate Cloudflare or Imperva.

Last reviewed: September 2026

G2

4.3120 reviews

Gartner

4.5200 reviews
Gartner MQ: Challenger (Gartner WAAP MQ 2024)

WAF / Web Application Firewall assessment

PROTECTIONStrong
OWASP Top 10 coverage
4 / 5
Bot management
4 / 5
OPERATIONSStrong
Rule management
4 / 5
Performance & latency
5 / 5
ANALYTICSStrong
Traffic & threat analytics
4 / 5
TRUST & ECOSYSTEMStrong
CDN & network quality
5 / 5

Strongest: Performance & latency

Watch out for: Traffic & threat analytics

Strengths & limitations

Strengths

●Native integration with AWS services - zero configuration for AWS-hosted apps
●Pay-per-use transparent pricing - no minimum commitment
●Managed rule groups from AWS and third-party providers on Marketplace

Watch out for

●Limited outside AWS - not suitable for multi-cloud or on-premises
●Rule management complexity at scale - requires dedicated expertise
●Less sophisticated bot management than Cloudflare or Imperva

Best for

AWS-native applications wanting integrated WAF without a separate vendor - especially combined with CloudFront CDN.

Not suitable for: Multi-cloud or non-AWS environments - AWS WAF only protects AWS-hosted resources.

Compliance coverage

●Essential Eight
●AU Privacy Act
●SOC 2
●HIPAA
●NIST CSF
●PCI-DSS
●CMMC
●GDPR
●NIS2
●DORA
●ISO 27001
●CIS Benchmarks

Switching intelligence

Switching from

Common migration paths based on review data

  • ModSecurity
  • On-premises WAF (AWS migration)

Also considering

Vendors typically shortlisted alongside

← Back to WAF / Web Application FirewallCompare with other WAF / Web Application Firewall vendors ➲

Quick facts

Pricing modelper rule per month + per million requests
Pricing range$5/month per rule + $0.60/million requests (transparent pricing)
Free trialYes
Min seatsNo minimum
Deployment time< 1 hour
Complexity2 / 5
Pricing transparency5 / 5
AU presenceYes
IRAP assessedYes
Open sourceProprietary

Deployment

ModelsSaaS (AWS native)
OS supportCloud-native
CloudAWS
SupportAWS Support tiers, Email, Chat, Phone (Business/Enterprise)
Data residencyUS, EU, AU, Global (follows AWS regions)

Company

Amazon Web Services

Founded 2006 · 1,500,000+ (Amazon) employees · Public

HQ: US

$100B+ AWS revenue FY2024

Certifications

FedRAMP High, ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS, IRAP PROTECTED

Integrations

CloudFrontApplication Load BalancerAPI GatewayAWS ShieldSplunkDatadogTerraform