Vendors › WAF / Web Application Firewall › AWS WAF
AWS WAF
Amazon Web Services
Combined score
▪ Editorial verdict
AWS WAF delivers the same operational efficiency proposition for web application security that the rest of AWS delivers for infrastructure: zero deployment, pay-as-you-go pricing, and native integration with the services that AWS-hosted applications already use. The 97.526% true positive rate in independent testing confirms that the detection quality is competitive with dedicated WAF vendors. For organisations running applications on AWS that need a starting WAF without procurement complexity or upfront commitment, AWS WAF is the natural first step.
The scope is AWS-hosted resources only. Applications running on Azure, GCP, on-premises, or multi-cloud environments are not protected, and advanced bot management sophistication is less than Cloudflare or Imperva.
The verdict: AWS WAF is right for AWS-native organisations wanting built-in WAF with no deployment overhead and transparent pay-as-you-go pricing. Multi-cloud and on-premises environments should evaluate Cloudflare or Imperva.
Last reviewed: May 2026
G2
Gartner
WAF / Web Application Firewall assessment
Strongest: Performance & latency
Watch out for: Traffic & threat analytics
Strengths & limitations
Strengths
Watch out for
Best for
AWS-native applications wanting integrated WAF without a separate vendor — especially combined with CloudFront CDN.
Not suitable for: Multi-cloud or non-AWS environments — AWS WAF only protects AWS-hosted resources.
Compliance coverage
Switching intelligence
Switching from
Common migration paths based on review data
- ModSecurity
- On-premises WAF (AWS migration)