Comparisec
Submit reviewFor vendors
WAF / Web Application FirewallAWS WAF
StrongStrongStrongStrong
4.4

VendorsWAF / Web Application FirewallAWS WAF

AWS WAF logo

AWS WAF

Amazon Web Services

Founded 2006·US·Public
4.4

Combined score

G2
4.3120
Gartner
4.5200

Editorial verdict

AWS WAF delivers the same operational efficiency proposition for web application security that the rest of AWS delivers for infrastructure: zero deployment, pay-as-you-go pricing, and native integration with the services that AWS-hosted applications already use. The 97.526% true positive rate in independent testing confirms that the detection quality is competitive with dedicated WAF vendors. For organisations running applications on AWS that need a starting WAF without procurement complexity or upfront commitment, AWS WAF is the natural first step.

The scope is AWS-hosted resources only. Applications running on Azure, GCP, on-premises, or multi-cloud environments are not protected, and advanced bot management sophistication is less than Cloudflare or Imperva.

The verdict: AWS WAF is right for AWS-native organisations wanting built-in WAF with no deployment overhead and transparent pay-as-you-go pricing. Multi-cloud and on-premises environments should evaluate Cloudflare or Imperva.

Last reviewed: May 2026

G2

4.3120 reviews

Gartner

4.5200 reviews
Gartner MQ: Challenger (Gartner WAAP MQ 2024)

WAF / Web Application Firewall assessment

PROTECTIONStrong
OWASP Top 10 coverage
4 / 5
Bot management
4 / 5
OPERATIONSStrong
Rule management
4 / 5
Performance & latency
5 / 5
ANALYTICSStrong
Traffic & threat analytics
4 / 5
TRUST & ECOSYSTEMStrong
CDN & network quality
5 / 5

Strongest: Performance & latency

Watch out for: Traffic & threat analytics

Strengths & limitations

Strengths

Native integration with AWS services — zero configuration for AWS-hosted apps
Pay-per-use transparent pricing — no minimum commitment
Managed rule groups from AWS and third-party providers on Marketplace

Watch out for

Limited outside AWS — not suitable for multi-cloud or on-premises
Rule management complexity at scale — requires dedicated expertise
Less sophisticated bot management than Cloudflare or Imperva

Best for

AWS-native applications wanting integrated WAF without a separate vendor — especially combined with CloudFront CDN.

Not suitable for: Multi-cloud or non-AWS environments — AWS WAF only protects AWS-hosted resources.

Compliance coverage

Essential Eight
AU Privacy Act
SOC 2
HIPAA
NIST CSF
PCI-DSS
CMMC
GDPR
NIS2
DORA
ISO 27001
CIS Benchmarks

Switching intelligence

Switching from

Common migration paths based on review data

  • ModSecurity
  • On-premises WAF (AWS migration)

Also considering

Vendors typically shortlisted alongside

← Back to WAF / Web Application FirewallCompare with other WAF / Web Application Firewall vendors →

Quick facts

Pricing modelper rule per month + per million requests
Pricing range$5/month per rule + $0.60/million requests (transparent pricing)
Free trialYes
Min seatsNo minimum
Deployment time< 1 hour
Complexity2 / 5
Pricing transparency5 / 5
AU presenceYes
IRAP assessedYes
Open sourceProprietary

Deployment

ModelsSaaS (AWS native)
OS supportCloud-native
CloudAWS
SupportAWS Support tiers, Email, Chat, Phone (Business/Enterprise)
Data residencyUS, EU, AU, Global (follows AWS regions)

Company

Amazon Web Services

Founded 2006 · 1,500,000+ (Amazon) employees · Public

HQ: US

$100B+ AWS revenue FY2024

Certifications

FedRAMP High, ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS, IRAP PROTECTED

Integrations

CloudFrontApplication Load BalancerAPI GatewayAWS ShieldSplunkDatadogTerraform