Comparisec
Submit reviewFor vendors
WAF / Web Application FirewallAzure Application Gateway WAF
AdequateStrongStrongStrong
4.4

VendorsWAF / Web Application FirewallAzure Application Gateway WAF

Azure Application Gateway WAF logo

Azure Application Gateway WAF

Microsoft

Founded 1975·US·Public
4.4

Combined score

G2
4.4180
Gartner
4.4220

Security incident on recordStorm-0558 July 2023 — affected Azure identity infrastructure (Entra), not Application Gateway WAF directly

Editorial verdict

Azure Application Gateway WAF delivers the same zero-deployment, native-integration value proposition for Azure workloads that AWS WAF delivers for AWS workloads. For organisations running applications on Azure, the native integration with Azure Sentinel, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Entra ID, and Intune creates a unified application security posture that third-party WAF vendors require significant integration work to approximate. The transparent pay-as-you-go pricing and the FedRAMP High and IRAP certifications inherited from the Azure platform make it well-suited for regulated and government environments.

The scope is Azure-hosted resources only. Multi-cloud and on-premises applications are not protected, and bot management sophistication is less than Cloudflare or Imperva.

The verdict: Azure Application Gateway WAF is right for Azure-hosted organisations wanting native WAF with zero deployment overhead and Microsoft security stack integration. Multi-cloud environments should evaluate Cloudflare or Imperva.

Last reviewed: May 2026

G2

4.4180 reviews

Gartner

4.4220 reviews
Gartner MQ: Challenger (Gartner WAAP MQ 2024)

WAF / Web Application Firewall assessment

PROTECTIONAdequate
OWASP Top 10 coverage
4 / 5
Bot management
3 / 5
OPERATIONSStrong
Rule management
3 / 5
Performance & latency
5 / 5
ANALYTICSStrong
Traffic & threat analytics
4 / 5
TRUST & ECOSYSTEMStrong
CDN & network quality
5 / 5

Strongest: Performance & latency

Watch out for: Rule management

Strengths & limitations

Strengths

Native Azure integration — zero friction for Azure-hosted applications
Pay-per-use transparent pricing — no minimum commitment
Tight integration with Azure Front Door, DDoS Protection, and Defender for Cloud

Watch out for

Limited outside Azure — single cloud vendor dependency
Bot management and advanced features significantly below Cloudflare or Imperva
WAF tuning requires Azure expertise — less intuitive than dedicated WAF platforms

Best for

Azure-native organisations wanting WAF integrated into their Azure infrastructure without a separate WAF vendor.

Not suitable for: Multi-cloud or non-Azure environments — Azure WAF only protects Azure-hosted resources.

Compliance coverage

Essential Eight
AU Privacy Act
SOC 2
HIPAA
NIST CSF
PCI-DSS
CMMC
GDPR
NIS2
DORA
ISO 27001
CIS Benchmarks

Switching intelligence

Switching from

Common migration paths based on review data

  • On-premises WAF (Azure migration)
  • ModSecurity

Also considering

Vendors typically shortlisted alongside

Also in our database

Microsoft also appears in:

← Back to WAF / Web Application FirewallCompare with other WAF / Web Application Firewall vendors →

Quick facts

Pricing modelper gateway hour + data processed
Pricing range$0.36/gateway hour + $0.008/GB processed (transparent)
Free trialYes
Min seatsNo minimum
Deployment time< 1 hour
Complexity2 / 5
Pricing transparency5 / 5
AU presenceYes
IRAP assessedYes
Open sourceProprietary

Deployment

ModelsSaaS (Azure native)
OS supportCloud-native
CloudAzure
SupportAzure Portal, Email, Phone (Business/Enterprise), Dedicated CSM
Data residencyUS, EU, AU, Global (Azure regions)

Company

Microsoft

Founded 1975 · 200,000+ employees · Public

HQ: US

Part of $211B Microsoft revenue FY2024

Certifications

FedRAMP High, ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS, IRAP PROTECTED

Integrations

Azure Front DoorAzure DDoS ProtectionDefender for CloudLog AnalyticsSentinelTerraform