Comparisec
← ZTNA / Zero Trust Network AccessAppgate SDP
StrongAdequateStrongStrong
4.4

Vendors › ZTNA / Zero Trust Network Access › Appgate SDP

Appgate SDP logo

Appgate SDP

Appgate

Founded 2015·US·PE-backed
4.4

Combined score

G2
4.458
Gartner
4.447

▪ Editorial verdict

Appgate SDP has built the most genuinely dynamic and granular access control engine in this comparison, continuously evaluating contextual risk and adjusting access in real time rather than only at login. The Software Defined Perimeter architecture with single-packet authorisation makes protected resources genuinely invisible to unauthorised users, a meaningful distinction for defence and critical infrastructure where reconnaissance resistance matters.

The honest trade-off is complexity: extensive policy configurability requires meaningfully more implementation investment than streamlined competitors.

The verdict: right for organisations with sophisticated, highly specific access policy requirements, particularly defence and critical infrastructure. Organisations wanting the simplest deployment should evaluate Twingate instead.

Last reviewed: September 2026

G2

4.458 reviews

Gartner

4.447 reviews

PeerSpot

8.135 reviews
Gartner MQ: Not in MQ

ZTNA / Zero Trust Network Access assessment

PROTECTIONStrong
App-level access control
5 / 5
Device posture checks
4 / 5
OPERATIONSAdequate
UX vs VPN
3 / 5
IAM & MFA integration
4 / 5
ANALYTICSStrong
Access & activity logs
4 / 5
TRUST & ECOSYSTEMStrong
Deployment flexibility
5 / 5

Strongest: App-level access control

Watch out for: UX vs VPN

Strengths & limitations

Strengths

●The most granular and genuinely dynamic access control policy engine, continuously evaluating risk and adjusting access in real time
●Single-packet authorisation architecture makes protected resources genuinely invisible to unauthorised users
●Strong fit for organisations with sophisticated, highly specific access policy requirements

Watch out for

●Deployment complexity and configuration depth require more implementation investment than streamlined cloud-native competitors
●Steeper learning curve for administrators given the platform's extensive policy configurability
●No Gartner Magic Quadrant presence despite genuine technical depth

Best for

Organisations with sophisticated, highly specific access policy requirements, particularly in defence and critical infrastructure.

Not suitable for: Organisations wanting the simplest, fastest ZTNA deployment without extensive policy configuration investment.

Compliance coverage

●Essential Eight
●AU Privacy Act
●SOC 2
●HIPAA
●NIST CSF
●PCI-DSS
●CMMC
●GDPR
●ISO 27001
○NIS2
○DORA
○CIS Benchmarks

Switching intelligence

Switching from

Common migration paths based on review data

  • Legacy VPN
  • Simpler ZTNA lacking policy granularity

Also considering

Vendors typically shortlisted alongside

← Back to ZTNA / Zero Trust Network AccessCompare with other ZTNA / Zero Trust Network Access vendors ➲

Quick facts

Pricing modelPer user, annual
Pricing rangeQuote-based, enterprise
Free trialNo
Min seatsNo minimum
Deployment time2-4 weeks
Complexity4 / 5
Pricing transparency1 / 5
AU presenceNo
IRAP assessedNo
Open sourceProprietary

Deployment

ModelsSaaS, On-premises, Hybrid
OS supportWindows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android
CloudAWS, Azure, GCP
SupportPhone, Email, Dedicated CSM, Professional Services
Data residencyUS, EU

Company

Appgate

Founded 2015 · 500-1000 employees · PE-backed

HQ: US

Not publicly disclosed

Certifications

SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, FedRAMP

Integrations

OktaMicrosoft Entra IDCrowdStrikeSplunk