Comparisec
Submit reviewFor vendors
← ZTNA / Zero Trust Network AccessTwingate
StrongStrongAdequateStrong
4.7

Vendors › ZTNA / Zero Trust Network Access › Twingate

Twingate logo

Twingate

Twingate

Founded 2019·US·VC-backed
4.7

Combined score

G2
4.7178
Gartner
4.789

▪ Editorial verdict

Twingate has built its reputation on solving the problem that undermines most ZTNA rollouts: end-user resistance. The lightweight client and genuinely fast deployment mean organisations consistently report replacing legacy VPN within days, and the split-tunnel architecture avoids the performance overhead that makes some VPN and ZTNA experiences frustrating.

The honest limitation is enterprise scale complexity: the largest enterprises with the most demanding device posture requirements will find Zscaler ZPA or Palo Alto Prisma Access offer greater depth.

The verdict: right for organisations of any size wanting the fastest, simplest ZTNA deployment with the best end-user experience. The largest enterprises should evaluate Zscaler ZPA instead.

Last reviewed: September 2026

G2

4.7178 reviews

Gartner

4.789 reviews
Gartner MQ: Not in MQ

ZTNA / Zero Trust Network Access assessment

PROTECTIONStrong
App-level access control
4 / 5
Device posture checks
4 / 5
OPERATIONSStrong
UX vs VPN
5 / 5
IAM & MFA integration
4 / 5
ANALYTICSAdequate
Access & activity logs
3 / 5
TRUST & ECOSYSTEMStrong
Deployment flexibility
4 / 5

Strongest: UX vs VPN

Watch out for: Access & activity logs

Strengths & limitations

Strengths

●The fastest, simplest ZTNA deployment in this comparison, with organisations reporting full VPN replacement within days
●Genuinely excellent end-user experience with a lightweight client generating minimal support tickets
●Free tier for up to 5 users makes it genuinely accessible for small teams and evaluation

Watch out for

●Enterprise-scale policy complexity and device posture integration is less mature than Zscaler ZPA or Palo Alto Prisma Access
●Smaller company scale and shorter track record than established enterprise ZTNA vendors
●No Gartner Magic Quadrant presence

Best for

Organisations of any size wanting the fastest, simplest ZTNA deployment with the best end-user experience.

Not suitable for: The largest enterprises with the most complex device posture and policy requirements.

Compliance coverage

●SOC 2
●HIPAA
●NIST CSF
●PCI-DSS
●GDPR
●ISO 27001
○Essential Eight
○AU Privacy Act
○CMMC
○NIS2
○DORA
○CIS Benchmarks

Switching intelligence

Switching from

Common migration paths based on review data

  • Legacy VPN
  • Complex enterprise ZTNA deployments

Also considering

Vendors typically shortlisted alongside

← Back to ZTNA / Zero Trust Network AccessCompare with other ZTNA / Zero Trust Network Access vendors ➲

Quick facts

Pricing modelPer user, annual
Pricing rangeFree tier up to 5 users; Business from $6/user/month
Free trialYes - 14 days
Min seatsNo minimum
Deployment time< 1 day
Complexity1 / 5
Pricing transparency4 / 5
AU presenceNo
IRAP assessedNo
Open sourceProprietary

Deployment

ModelsSaaS
OS supportWindows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android
CloudAWS, Azure, GCP
SupportEmail, Chat
Data residencyUS, EU

Company

Twingate

Founded 2019 · 50-200 employees · VC-backed

HQ: US

Not publicly disclosed

Certifications

SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001

Integrations

OktaMicrosoft Entra IDGoogle WorkspaceCrowdStrike