Comparisec
Submit reviewFor vendors
← ZTNA / Zero Trust Network AccessForcepoint ONE ZTNA
AdequateAdequateAdequateAdequate
4.1

Vendors › ZTNA / Zero Trust Network Access › Forcepoint ONE ZTNA

Forcepoint ONE ZTNA logo

Forcepoint ONE ZTNA

Forcepoint

Founded 1994·US·PE-backed
4.1

Combined score

G2
4.161
Gartner
4.148

▪ Editorial verdict

Forcepoint ONE ZTNA extends the company's data-centric security philosophy into zero trust access, applying the same data sensitivity awareness that defines Forcepoint's DLP and CASB products to access control decisions. For existing Forcepoint DLP or CASB customers, this creates a unified policy fabric across access and data protection.

The concerns across the rest of Forcepoint's portfolio apply equally here: Francisco Partners ownership, deployment and user experience trailing cloud-native specialists, and no Gartner Magic Quadrant presence.

The verdict: right for existing Forcepoint DLP or CASB customers wanting integrated data-centric ZTNA. Organisations evaluating ZTNA independently should shortlist Zscaler ZPA or Cloudflare Zero Trust.

Last reviewed: September 2026

G2

4.161 reviews

Gartner

4.148 reviews

PeerSpot

7.730 reviews
Gartner MQ: Not in MQ

ZTNA / Zero Trust Network Access assessment

PROTECTIONAdequate
App-level access control
4 / 5
Device posture checks
3 / 5
OPERATIONSAdequate
UX vs VPN
3 / 5
IAM & MFA integration
3 / 5
ANALYTICSAdequate
Access & activity logs
3 / 5
TRUST & ECOSYSTEMAdequate
Deployment flexibility
3 / 5

Strongest: App-level access control

Watch out for: Deployment flexibility

Strengths & limitations

Strengths

●Native integration with Forcepoint's data-centric DLP and CASB capabilities applying data sensitivity context to access decisions
●Unified SSE platform combining ZTNA, CASB, and DLP from one vendor for consolidated policy management
●Established three decade enterprise track record in data protection and network security

Watch out for

●Francisco Partners PE ownership raises long-term investment trajectory questions
●Deployment and user experience trails dedicated cloud-native ZTNA specialists like Twingate or Cloudflare
●No Gartner Magic Quadrant presence, and market momentum has declined relative to SSE category leaders

Best for

Existing Forcepoint DLP or CASB customers wanting ZTNA integrated with their broader data-centric security policy.

Not suitable for: Organisations evaluating ZTNA independently who want the strongest current market momentum or best end-user experience.

Compliance coverage

●Essential Eight
●AU Privacy Act
●SOC 2
●HIPAA
●NIST CSF
●PCI-DSS
●GDPR
●ISO 27001
○CMMC
○NIS2
○DORA
○CIS Benchmarks

Switching intelligence

Switching from

Common migration paths based on review data

  • Legacy VPN without DLP integration

Also considering

Vendors typically shortlisted alongside

Also in our database

Forcepoint also appears in:

← Back to ZTNA / Zero Trust Network AccessCompare with other ZTNA / Zero Trust Network Access vendors ➲

Quick facts

Pricing modelPer user, annual
Pricing rangeQuote-based, mid-market to enterprise
Free trialNo
Min seatsNo minimum
Deployment time2-4 weeks
Complexity3 / 5
Pricing transparency2 / 5
AU presenceYes
IRAP assessedNo
Open sourceProprietary

Deployment

ModelsSaaS
OS supportWindows, macOS, iOS, Android
CloudAWS, Azure, GCP
SupportPhone, Email, Dedicated CSM
Data residencyUS, EU, AU

Company

Forcepoint

Founded 1994 · 1000+ employees · PE-backed

HQ: US

Not publicly disclosed

Certifications

SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001

Integrations

Forcepoint DLPForcepoint ONE CASBOktaMicrosoft Entra ID